but legal writers — judges, law review authors, casebook writers — get them wrong staggeringly often, maybe more often than they get ‘em right.
Site Search
-
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Dave Gottlieb on More band names
- Dave Gottlieb on More band names
- duty and the deist on More band names
- Dave Gottlieb on More band names
- duty and the deist on More band names
Archives
Meta
Examples?
Why won’t you answer Dice’s question?
Maybe I should, but I haven’t made it a priority because no example will prove my point. I could pick out a few examples of parenthetical-comma fuck-ups, but that would be possible from any large body of writing. Actually showing that my observation about their frequency is right would require a ton of work.
Sorry, I just mean, what is a paranthetical comma, and how would a judge mess it up?
Parenthetical commas are commas used to enclose parenthetical phrases, which basically means phrases you could put in parentheses. So the sentence
could also be written as
A version with neither commas nor parentheses would also be acceptable. However, judges (and especially journal authors) love to fuck it up and write,
which not only beggars belief but in this case totally changes the meaning of the sentence. Usually, though, they make subtler versions of that mistake, and the results are still comprehensible. So for example they might write, “and, especially journal authors,” when they mean, “and, especially, journal authors.”
Right, but you can often figure things out in context. So for instance, in this case we all know that Alan is the slave monkey.
Haha. Thanks. I use them all the time; I didn’t know they were called that.