There are some who say, well, too bad for the boys. If they are inattentive, obstreperous and distracting to their teachers and peers, that’s their problem. After all, the ability to regulate one’s impulses, delay gratification, sit still and pay close attention are the cornerstones of success in school and in the work force. It’s long past time for women to claim their rightful share of the economic rewards that redound to those who do well in school.
As one critic told me recently, the classroom is no more rigged against boys than workplaces are rigged against lazy and unfocused workers. But unproductive workers are adults — not 5-year-olds. If boys are restless and unfocused, why not look for ways to help them do better? As a nation, can we afford not to?
A few decades ago, when we realized that girls languished behind boys in math and science, we mounted a concerted effort to give them more support, with significant success. Shouldn’t we do the same for boys?
- backpacking tour iran on Materialism, teleology, and magic
- les cimes la clusaz on Materialism, teleology, and magic
- Cheri Bellino on New(?) Theory: “Decadent” societies seem bad primarily because their documentary records are more thorough and honest
- Sylvester Homer on New(?) Theory: “Decadent” societies seem bad primarily because their documentary records are more thorough and honest
- cheap steelers gear on Materialism, teleology, and magic