Why does Language Log love “prescriptivism”? What does it even mean?

(My theory, which I posted on Metafilter a minute ago. NB I briefly discussed this topic w/ Sarang some time ago. I lost the exchange but he has probably influenced my views. Note also that there is a pretty good Language Log post on this subject.)

There is no prescriptivism. There is no descriptivism. These words don’t describe mutually exclusive opposed positions. If you try to define them rigorously you will not be able to cleanly distinguish them. I think we owe their vernacular ubiquity to the success of Language Log (note that I’m not claiming LL invented them).

“Prescriptivism” in particular is a kind of culture-war tag for a certain family of popular, non-professional language criticism, like “Eats Shoots and Leaves” or “The Elements of Style.” These works are often pedantic, and they often include stylistic pronouncements based on usage errors or false generalizations. Furthermore they often include a more-or-less explicit social conservatism (language was better in the good old days; it is okay to criticize poor people for deviating from Standard English). So the fit isn’t one-to-one, but I think it makes sense to think of “prescriptivism” as a label for a family of populist linguistic-conservate rhetoric.
Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Paula Deen’s diabetes and theories of blame

Celeb chef Paula Deen has announced she has Type II diabetes, and become the spokesperson for a major diabetes drug. Apparently the backstory is that her food is extremely unhealthy. Do you buy this moral theory:

Whatever Bourdain’s personal faults, he is right as rain about how sleazy it is for Paula Deen to sponsor medical treatments for an ailment caused — not exclusively, but increasingly — by the same willfully self-destructive lifestyle she also sells on her Food Network shows and in her numerous cookbooks. The increase in type II diabetes incidence and increase in obesity rates is not accidental, and she makes money from both ends of this disease. That’s disgusting. (source)

Cf.

I’m fat and I’ve never made a single one of Paula Deen’s recipes. Who do I get to blame?

Is the contention seriously that Deen is tricking people into cooking her recipes by claiming that they are healthy? And then profiting by marketing Diabetes drugs to the victims of her nefarious scheme to hide the fact that butter has fat in it.

To be less snarky, I do not believe that a single person in the entire United States watches Deen’s show and thinks, “Wow, that looks like such a healthy meal!” (source)

UPDATE: apparently her deal is building cheeseburgers with donuts or something and calling it traditional southern cuisine. Not sure if this is hyperbole. (FURTHER.)

Posted in Uncategorized | 12 Comments

Some Games I Actually Played in 2011 (kinda)


At the end of 2010, I posted “10 Games I Actually Played in 2010,” and found it a useful summing-up. I decided to try again this year, but I couldn’t think of 10 Games I Actually Played in 2011. The list below is truncated accordingly. (And even so contains a bit of a fudge — I didn’t actually play Jamestown until 2011, except possibly the tutorial.)

Naturally, a top-10 list is right out. But I did get to play a bunch of excellent games last year. I recommend all of the below basically without reservation. Did I only play great games in 2011? Well no but what’s the point of listing every forgettable iOS skinner box I put a few minutes (or hours) into?

EDIT: added a game I had forgotten — Portal 2.
EDIT EDIT: added Bastion! Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Peanut Butter Scruples

Weird shit reminder from Metafilter:

The Peanut Butter Solution is a 1985 Canadian ‘family’ film about a boy who is scared bald trying to sneak into a burned house and cops a hairgrowth recipe from two ghosts. Then things get weird. See for yourself [google video, 90 min]
posted by mannequito (33 comments total) [add to favorites] 20 users marked this as a favorite [!]

When I was growing up, we knew a family that was deep into this movie. I may have been 10 or 11, the family had a daughter a few years older — the kind of age gap where her interest in you is purely oh-a-cute-kid but you can endure or ignore that for a chance to get close to the magic. I remember them calling it “Peanut Butter Scruples” — they may have had a hairy dog named “Scruples” whose fur looked like the magical growth from the movie. All I really remember is the hair, the name, and possibly some peanut butter.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Greenwald on Paul, Obama and the hell of election seasons

Glenn Greenwald has this long harangue about the dumbness of the politically informed. I used to think Greenwald was shrill(!) and I suppose I still do but I increasingly agree with him, and if one feels onesself to be “in the wilderness” one may sympathize more with the lone voice shouting no matter how shrill.

Whatever else one wants to say, it is indisputably true that Ron Paul is the only political figure with any sort of a national platform — certainly the only major presidential candidate in either party — who advocates policy views on issues that liberals and progressives have long flamboyantly claimed are both compelling and crucial. The converse is equally true: the candidate supported by liberals and progressives and for whom most will vote — Barack Obama — advocates views on these issues (indeed, has taken action on these issues) that liberals and progressives have long claimed to find repellent, even evil.

As Matt Stoller argued in a genuinely brilliant essay on the history of progressivism and the Democratic Party which I cannot recommend highly enough: “the anger [Paul] inspires comes not from his positions, but from the tensions that modern American liberals bear within their own worldview.” Ron Paul’s candidacy is a mirror held up in front of the face of America’s Democratic Party and its progressive wing, and the image that is reflected is an ugly one; more to the point, it’s one they do not want to see because it so violently conflicts with their desired self-perception.

I think para 1 is inarguable while para 2 seems like a reach. The conclusion (and a nice litany of Obamian sins):
Continue reading

Posted in Political | Tagged | 4 Comments

Is This A Thing? (Fireworks in your home edition)

Last night at 4AM Steph and I were awoken by an explosive booming, loud as a gunshot but with the flapping aftershock of a fart. Then, a minute later, another. Then another. Somewhat terrified, we peered out the window, and as the next boom went off I saw a constellation of red lights flare briefly in a high window across the back lot. Fireworks.

I don’t actually know that the fireworks were going off inside — in fact, that seems insane. More likely, then, I saw them reflected in the window. Where were they actually? Somewhere on the roofs above me? I live in a nice neighborhood. Nocturnal explosions are a rarity. Yet here someone had loaded up on New Years ordnance, got excited a week early, and set them off somewhere while I was trying to sleep.

Is this a thing?

None of the neighborhood sites are reporting anything; this is not news I guess. Fucking annoying though and I hope it doesn’t become a regular occurrence. I read some messageboard traffic about similar happenings elsewhere.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

7 Improbable Game Nights

I have the chance to enjoy the occasional board / other game night. In fact I enjoy them a lot. But they rarely live up to my more ambitious game night fantasies. I love to get in a few rounds of Dominion or something, but it’s not what I dream about. (Actually I probably do literally dream about Dominion, having played some 1,100 games of it this year, but that’s not what I meant.) The Mule is very persuasive

Recently I was at a friend’s house for a game night and was ambushed by a complete experimental ruleset for an asymmetrical Monopoly variant. You may be skeptical; I was. But I was pleasantly surprised. It was a long evening of Coasean arm-twisting, and on top of that I won. (Of course, since the variant is quite asymmetrical, it may have been wildly unbalanced in my favor; my role was nerfed three times before the game was over.)

Anyway the point is it was a bold and interesting thing to do, a departure from the quotidian game night.

More ambitious game nights I’ve been wanting to do for a while:

  • M.U.L.E. with local multiplayer, God will someone else I know play this game?
  • Robo Rally — I bought this game in 2009 and can count the number of times I’ve used it on one hand. People are oddly wary of it.
  • Haven’t played Jamestown yet but kinda want to try the coop
  • Ditto Hoard — for which I have a bunch of extra licenses to give out
  • A role-playing game conceived of and run by someone else
  • Also I have so far managed to play Descent only once

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Pot, kettle

Teenagers are smoking more marijuana. I’ve got good news and bad news.

One out of every 15 high school students smokes marijuana on a near daily basis, a figure that has reached a 30-year peak even as use of alcohol, cigarettes and cocaine among teenagers continues a slow decline, according to a new government report.

While interest in marijuana and synthetic marijuana has climbed, the willingness to try most other drugs has waned.

Heavy drinking among high school students has also fallen over the past 20 years, the report found. … The percentage of students who reported binge drinking fell by a third, to 13.6 percent from 20 percent.

Nah just joshing you. That was all good news. From Metafilter, the bad news: Arctic Ocean “boiling like a pot”:

In an exclusive interview with The Independent, Igor Semiletov, of the Far Eastern branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, said that he has never before witnessed the scale and force of the methane being released from beneath the Arctic seabed.

The scale is orders of magnitude above that previously observed. Melting ice leading to rapid methane liberation is one of the feedback loops often invoked in rapid global warming doomsday stories.

UPDATE: the Times Dot Earth blog is reporting that this is no big deal. They quote from a broader scientific literature:

[T]he authors found that roughly 1 meter of the subsurface permafrost thawed in the past 25 years, adding to the 25 meters of already thawed soil. Forecasting the expected future permafrost thaw, the authors found that even under the most extreme climatic scenario tested this thawed soil growth will not exceed 10 meters by 2100 or 50 meters by the turn of the next millennium. The authors note that the bulk of the methane stores in the east Siberian shelf are trapped roughly 200 meters below the seafloor…

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Updating the Di Fara formula

Di Fara is the cult hole-in-the-wall in Midwood where you can wait an hour to buy pizza at prices of about $5 / slice. It’s great, obviously. Turns out the management is more engaged than you might have thought:

The interesting thing about Di Fara is that Dom is not just a bug in amber doing things the way he’s always done them. That’s sort of a false notion I think a lot of Di Fara–goers subscribe to. As his daughter Margaret Mieles notes in that heavy hand link (above), her father changed his methods at some point in the late ’00s, becoming more generous with ingredients. And when I chatted with Dom Jr. once, he noted that his father reads the reviews here and there and responds to them. For instance, Dom Jr. told me that his father used to not make all the pies himself. But once he read the press trumpeting this notion, he felt like he had to give the people what they’d read about. And so he changed his M.O.

From Slice, a “point-counterpoint” on the restaurant. (Actually not worth reading overall.)

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Read recently: Vortex, Disgrace

By Robert Charles WIlson and J. M. Coetzee (who — did you know — is sort of a computer scientist). They’re both fantastic.

[PS I have a free PDF copy of Spin, the book to which Vortex is an ultimate sequel. It's a Hugo winner and one of my very favorite SF of the past 10 years or so; drop me a line if you'd like it. Brief endorsement from Henry Farrell.]

A few words on Wilson:
Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment